Peru
Practice Relating to Rule 70. Weapons of a Nature to Cause Superfluous Injury or Unnecessary Suffering
Peru’s IHL Manual (2004) states: “It is prohibited to use weapons that can … cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering.”
The manual also states: “Causing unnecessary suffering and superfluous injury is prohibited and should be avoided. All forms of violence that are not absolutely necessary to gain an advantage over the enemy are also prohibited.”
Peru’s IHL and Human Rights Manual (2010) states: “It is prohibited to use weapons that can … cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering.”
The manual also states: “Causing unnecessary suffering or superfluous injury is prohibited and should be avoided. All forms of violence that are not absolutely necessary to gain an advantage over the enemy are also prohibited.”
Peru’s Decree on the Use of Force by the Armed Forces (2010) states:
The following principles are recognized by the norms of international humanitarian law as applying before, during and after the use of force:
…
c.
Limitation. … International humanitarian law prohibits the use of means and methods of using force which may cause unnecessary suffering or harm.
In a statement at the First Review Conference of States Parties to the Certain Conventional Weapons in 1995, Peru declared that it “shared the international community’s concern at the increasing use of certain conventional weapons, including anti-personnel landmines, whose devastating effects on the civilian population had been well documented”. It added that “the Review Conference was duty bound to bring an end to the humanitarian crisis caused by such weapons”.