Règle correspondante
Burundi
Practice Relating to Rule 50. Destruction and Seizure of Property of an Adversary
Burundi’s Regulations on International Humanitarian Law (2007) states that the “extensive destruction or appropriation of property not justified by military necessity” constitutes a “grave breach” of IHL. 
Burundi, Règlement n° 98 sur le droit international humanitaire, Ministère de la Défense Nationale et des Anciens Combattants, Projet “Moralisation” (BDI/B-05), August 2007, Part I bis, p. 27; see also pp. 67 and 115.
The Regulations also states that the “destruction of towns and villages or devastation not justified by military necessity” constitutes “violations of the laws and customs of war”. 
Burundi, Règlement n° 98 sur le droit international humanitaire, Ministère de la Défense Nationale et des Anciens Combattants, Projet “Moralisation” (BDI/B-05), August 2007, Part I bis, p. 26; see also Part I bis, p. 45.
Burundi’s Penal Code (1981) provides that a person who commits “[a]n attack whose aim it is to carry out … devastation … is punished with death”. 
Burundi, Penal Code, 1981, Article 417.
Burundi’s Law on Genocide, Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes (2003) states:
[The following are] considered as war crimes:
A. Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 8 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts aimed at persons or objects protected by the provisions of the Geneva Conventions:
d) extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and arbitrarily;
B. Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflicts, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts:
m) destroying or seizing the property of an adversary unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of the conflict;
D. Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in armed conflicts not of an international character, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts:
l) destroying or seizing the property of an adversary unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of the conflict. 
Burundi, Law on Genocide, Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes, 2003, Article 4(A)(d), (B)(m) and (D)(1).
Burundi’s Penal Code (2009) states:
“War crimes” means crimes which are committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes, in particular:
1. Any of the following grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions … :
4°. Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly;
2. Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflict, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts:
13°. Destroying or seizing the enemy’s property unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war;
5. … [S]erious violations of the laws and customs applicable in armed conflicts not of an international character, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts:
12°. Destroying or seizing the property of an adversary unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of the conflict. 
Burundi, Penal Code, 2009, Article 1981(4o), (2)(13o) and (5)(12o).