Related Rule
Malta
Practice Relating to Rule 100. Fair Trial Guarantees
Upon ratification of the 1977 Additional Protocol I, Malta stated in relation to Article 75:
Sub-paragraph (e) of paragraph 4 is not incompatible with legislation providing that any defendant, who causes a disturbance at the trial or whose presence is likely to impede the questioning of another defendant or the hearing or another witness or expert witness, may be removed from the courtroom. 
Malta, Reservations made upon accession to the 1977 Additional Protocols I and II, 17 April 1989, § 1(a).
Upon ratification of the 1977 Additional Protocol II, Malta stated in relation to Article 6:
paragraph 2, sub-paragraph (e) of Protocol II will be applied insofar as it is not incompatible with legislation providing that any defendant, who causes a disturbance at the trial or whose presence is likely to impede the questioning of another defendant or the hearing of a witness or expert witness, may be removed from the courtroom. 
Malta, Reservations made upon accession to the 1977 Additional Protocols I and II, 17 April 1989, § 2.
Upon ratification of the 1977 Additional Protocol I, Malta stated in relation to Article 75 that “sub-paragraph (h) of paragraph 4 is not incompatible with legal provisions authorizing the reopening of proceedings that have resulted in a final declaration of conviction or acquittal”. 
Malta, Reservations made upon accession to the 1977 Additional Protocols I and II, 17 April 1989, § 1(b).