Related Rule
Italy
Practice Relating to Rule 129. The Act of Displacement
Italy’s IHL Manual (1991) provides that the occupying State has the duty “not to undertake forced transfers or to deport civilian persons outside the occupied territory”. 
Italy, Manuale di diritto umanitario, Introduzione e Volume I, Usi e convenzioni di Guerra, SMD-G-014, Stato Maggiore della Difesa, I Reparto, Ufficio Addestramento e Regolamenti, Rome, 1991, Vol. I, § 48(8).
The manual further states that “forced deportation of the civilian population of the occupied territory to accomplish forced labour” is one of the principal war crimes incorporated in national legislation. 
Italy, Manuale di diritto umanitario, Introduzione e Volume I, Usi e convenzioni di Guerra, SMD-G-014, Stato Maggiore della Difesa, I Reparto, Ufficio Addestramento e Regolamenti, Rome, 1991, Vol. I, § 84.
The manual adds that grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and the 1977 Additional Protocols are considered war crimes, including “transfer and deportation of the civilian population”. 
Italy, Manuale di diritto umanitario, Introduzione e Volume I, Usi e convenzioni di Guerra, SMD-G-014, Stato Maggiore della Difesa, I Reparto, Ufficio Addestramento e Regolamenti, Rome, 1991, Vol. I, § 85.
Italy’s Law on Genocide (1967) prohibits the displacement of national, ethnic, racial or religious groups. 
Italy, Law on Genocide, 1967, Article 2.
Italy’s Wartime Military Penal Code (1941), as amended in 2002, states:
Except when the fact constitutes a more serious offence, the serviceman who, for reasons associated with the war, is guilty of … illegal transfers or other conduct prohibited by international conventions … against war prisoners, civilians or other persons protected by international conventions, is punished with two to five years military imprisonment. 
Italy, Wartime Military Penal Code, 1941, as amended on 31 January 2002, Article 185-bis.
In its decision in the Ferrini case in 2004, Italy’s Supreme Court of Cassation stated:
7.2. As has been noted … the facts forming the basis of the claim for compensation made by the plaintiff consist of his capture and deportation to Germany to be used as a “non-voluntary worker” by German companies.
In line with Resolution 95-I of 11 December 1946, with which the United Nations General Assembly confirmed the principles of international law of the Charter and the judgment of the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal, both the deportation and subjection to forced labour should be included among “war crimes” and therefore among crimes governed by international law.
The Charter, signed in London on 8 August 1945, stated that the category of “war crimes” also includes “deportation to forced labour” (Article 6, letter (b)).
The decision from the Nuremberg Tribunal of 30 September 1946 noted that such conduct constituted a “flagrant” violation of the Convention pertaining to laws and customs of war on land, signed at the Hague on 18 October 1907, whose appended Regulations established that services could be demanded of “inhabitants (only) to meet the requirements of the occupation” (Article 52), therefore prohibiting any such services from being required for other purposes. The applicability of this provision was challenged by the defendants, which made reference to article 2 of the Convention, noting that the Convention had not been signed by any of the belligerent States. The objection was overruled by the Tribunal, noting that in 1939 (and therefore before the start of the conflict) the “rules” that it had established had been recognised and accepted by all civil nations and had therefore taken on the force and status of customary law.
7.3. The assimilation of deportation and the subjection of deportees to forced labour as an “international crime” is confirmed both by the principles of international law adopted in June 1950 by the United Nations International Law Commission (principle VI), and by the Resolutions of the United Nations Security Council of 25 May 1993, 927/93 and 8 November 1994 no. 955/94, through which were adopted, respectively, the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (Articles 2 and 5) and the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (Article 3). It is also confirmed by the Convention through which the International Criminal Court was established, signed in Rome in 17 July 1998 by 139 States (of which 120 ratified it) and which entered into force on 1 July 2002 (articles 7 and 8).
7.4. Even if the points made in the decision referred to in the previous paragraph are not taken into account, there can be no doubt that in this regard a norm of general customary international law has emerged for all components of the international community. 
Italy, Supreme Court of Cassation, Ferrini case, Decision, 11 March 2004, §§ 7.2–7.4.
Italy’s IHL Manual (1991) provides that it is possible to undertake “total or partial evacuation of a given area of the occupied territory if the security of the population or imperative military reasons so demand”. 
Italy, Manuale di diritto umanitario, Introduzione e Volume I, Usi e convenzioni di Guerra, SMD-G-014, Stato Maggiore della Difesa, I Reparto, Ufficio Addestramento e Regolamenti, Rome, 1991, Vol. I, § 48(8).