Hungary
Practice Relating to Rule 65. Perfidy
Hungary’s Military Manual (1992) considers perfidy as a “prohibited method” of warfare.
The manual states that perfidy is “to falsely claim protected status, thereby inviting the confidence of the enemy”.
Under Hungary’s Military Manual (1992), feigning incapacitation by wounds or sickness is an example of perfidy.
Under Hungary’s Military Manual (1992), feigning surrender constitutes an example of perfidy.

It also states that the “perfidious use of distinctive protective signs” is a grave breach of the law of war and a war crime.
Hungary’s Military Manual (1992) states that “to falsely claim protected status, thereby inviting the confidence of the enemy: e.g. misuse of: … flag of truce” is an act of perfidy.
The manual further states that the “perfidious use of distinctive protective signs” is a grave breach of the law of war and a war crime.
Under Hungary’s Military Manual (1992), the misuse of distinctive signs is an act of perfidy.
The manual also states that the “perfidious use of distinctive protective signs” is a grave breach of the law of war and a war crime.
Hungary’s Military Manual (1992) gives as an example of perfidy “to falsely claim protected status, thereby inviting the confidence of the enemy”,
inter alia, by using the UN flag.
The manual also states that the “perfidious use of distinctive protective signs” is a grave breach of the law of war and a war crime.
Hungary’s Military Manual (1992) states that the “perfidious use of distinctive protective signs” is a grave breach and a war crime.